- Do a lot of things early on in life like joining conferences and clubs to explore your interests. Identify why you loved the the things that you love, and find jobs that you believe would need those skill sets.
- Communication skills is one of the most important things that you could have for almost any job. It is also a transferable to any career, so you will never miss your shot even if you changed fields.
- Try and find a mentor when you are new to the job. A good mentor will help you through the challenges and teach you the basics until you can go off and mentor others. You can gain a edge over others this way, and also adapt into your position better.
Preposition: this is a speech given by graham in his late years
Hook: ? (something investment related) [try using a story/or question]
Body (rising action): explanation of value investing
- Value investing vs. speculating (explain speculating)
- What is value investing about? (1-2 POINTS)
These (climax): You need to invest in qualities of your life that is deemed valuable by analysis, because life is full of sheep like participants who follow the flock to do what all others do and believe in what others believe
- Whatever you do, do it with a purpose and commit to it once you choose it
Conclusion: best of luck to you and every thing that you choose to invest in. I look forward to your name on life’s superinvestor’s list.
Few outside the investment circle would have known him, but to those that lounge on Wall Street, it is as familiar as the names of George Washington or Pythagoras. He is Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing.
Graham was born in England, but he soon moved to New York with his two older brothers. His father died young at only 35, leaving his family in the care of Maurice Gerard, his uncle who is a civil engineer. Gerard quickly realized young Graham’s talents and nurtured them, later even becoming one of Graham’s first business partners. Graham then achieved the second highest score ever given on a national scholarship test and was accepted into the University of Columbia with a scholarship. He graduated the second of his class.
Upon entering Wall Street, he worked his way up, from the very basic job of posting stock listings to a highly respected investor. He used his natural talents of logic and mathematics to analyse the market and the companies behind them, opening a new path to investments. It is not just about looking at fluctuations and the DJIA, the company asset value, or insider information. By combining deep analysis into all parts of company data, he created a cult in Wall Street who followed his example to this day.
He had realized at the peak of career that he has a duty to pass on his knowledge and thinkings to those who need it. He went to teach at his alma mater, Columbia University, creating a popular course that many of the current world’s greatest investors sat through. His most famous student is perhaps Warren Buffett, with a net worth of 79.2 B dollars. Graham’s natural love of teaching able young minds and his talent for using examples and class debates to reinforce concepts made him a hugely popular teacher with many students travelling from remote places to see him. This group of students eventually became the Graham-Dodds ville, an intellectual village with many elites in Wall Street. The success of those who followed Graham can be clearly seen in Buffett’s 1984 speech of “The Superinvestors“. Graham’s brilliant theories in a world of chance helped many stand their ground even in crisis, and saved them from a fate of bankruptcy. He made his contributions to the economy by levitating investor’s faith in stock exchange after crashes and giving birth to many of the world’s greatest philanthropists. He ideas helped materialize the dreams of many who had nothing but their mind, their 200 dollars and their passion.
Logic and mathematical thinking has always been part of my approach on the world, and the investment community have always been a jewel that I want to explore. Growing up in a foreign country with a middle class family, Graham had learnt to be confident of himself and to believe in his potential to achieve. His generosity and air of positivity are things that I look up to. I believe that his ideas on investing will not just apply to the financial field, but also the lives of everyone influenced by him.
The film “2081” was a better medium for the story of Harrison Bergeron. This is mostly due to the fact that it is much more realistic and occur in settings that we can relate to. When reading the short story, “Harrison Bergeron”, we are not inclined to take the story and understand or apply it in our world because of the fantasy-like descriptions of Harrison. Instances like him carrying three hundred pounds, flying and “[abandoning] the law of gravity and the laws of motion,” decreased the effectiveness of the satire by stripping away connections to the real world. As readers, we create meaning both though the text and our previous experiences, so if we can’t make any obvious connections when reading, we take away less from the story. Besides that, the film conveys messages to us through imagery and sound. Harrison is seen with long hair, in a white suit carrying his handicaps on his shoulders. It is a familiar allusion to Jesus, who died for the redemption of his people, hinting that Harrison may be the only savior of his world. On the same level, sound was also used to the story’s advantage. We know that Hazel unconsciously hums the song that played during Harrison’s confrontation with the HG men. It makes us wonder whether she really remember Harrison’s tragic death. These kinds of references are never found in the short story, and they invite us to probe deeper into the tale. The film helps us know more of Harrison, George and even Hazel’s wants and fears, making it a superior medium for the short satire.
Sorry, I thought I posted it, but actually not. I found out when showing it to others at lunch on Tuesday.
The these in David Suzuki ‘s “Racism”, told through scientific discoveries as well as personal anecdotes, is that we should always stand up to bigotry. He states that we are otherwise tacitly supporting it, and soon, it will be our turn too if the practice of racism is not stopped. As a geneticist, Suzuki uncovered the ugly misconception behind racial discrimination, that for example, it was thought that all Japanese people hide treachery because of an action taken by a nation that Nisei and Sansei have never seen. Suzuki himself “[has] always been keen to inform people and raise the alarm about misapplication of the rules of hereditary”, and it may have changed someone as profoundly as the acts of kindness that he received from the Chinese cook or the RCMP (20). Bigotry is still in our lives today, even in this ideal world. In the news, we hear of stories of people being harassed for their ethnicity, and in schools, stereotypes restrict our potentials. Even as youths who doesn’t seem to hold a lot of say, Suzuki urges his grandsons and the readers to speak up about bigotry, because the cycle just might stop in our generation. It is when bigotry is the norm that it prevails. By stopping the “[people with] closed minds, ignorance, and fear of difference,” as Suzuki summed up, we can bring awareness to those who rejects or are oblivious of the past, to make them understand the damage it deals, and the fallacy of its origins (30).
From the firm and shocking TED talk, “The Danger of a Single Story”, to the tragic story of “The Metaphor”, I took away the idea that physical appearances or outward personalities are only single stories that need to be expanded, and that we need to seek out more stories and share them to the world so that people can be understood. In the story “Emil” by Stuart Mclean, we see the character Dave judging and squishing Emil into the general stereotype of homelessness. It is until later that Dave began to connect and understand Emil with the help of his wife. Morley, in this case, shows stories that fills the single story of Emil to Dave, helping Dave build compassion and empathy. “The Metaphor” by Budge Wilson brings a more stricken message. Miss Hancock’s makeup that is applied with “an excess of zeal and a minimum of control” along with her overly dramatic attitude that younger children delights over betrays her in front of parents and youth (215). The grade 10 class that Miss Hancock enters “white with tension and left it defeated” eventually pushed her to her end (230). Miss Hancock is a single story of a somewhat insane and childish teacher to her class, and Charlotte, as the only one to know the other side of the equation, of what a great teacher she could be, remains silent. To Charlotte, life’s most precious gifts are “the admiration of my peers, local fame, boys, social triumphs,” and it is not surprising that she is silent about her inner compassion towards Miss Hancock (227). If Charlotte and her classmates had had a more complete story of what success in life mean, and they can learn not just from watching adults in their shells, but connect with them and touch their hearts, it may be a different story.
What comes to our mind when we think of the word “homeless” is a multitude of words that describes greed, addiction and violence. Sometimes, we neglect to consider the fact that even those with no materialistic worth can be kind-hearted. In the story “Emil” by Stuart McLean, the character Morley realized that being charitable often have nothing to do with being privileged after her encounters with Emil. Her attempts to offer the homeless man money and food are often waved away, as Emil would say, “I don’t need it, I have enough. I have enough.” (111) Furthermore, when Emil won the lottery, he gave more than half of it away to his friends who helped him. Emil, as a man with no work, home or possessions except a remote control, broke the stereotypical impression of his kind by acting with altruism and thrift. As the story finishes, Morley finally realized that it is the heart that pushes someone to give back to the society, not the privileges that they may possess.
After Montag reveals his hidden books to his wife and persuades her to read it along with him, it really impressed me about how much Montag has grown in his confidence in himself. His internal conflict is obvious and striking, a clash between everything he had known and the haunting shadows of books. Montag wants to find out more about the past, when books weren’t burnt, and he seeks the find out about what books trap between those dusty, yellow pages. Yet, he knew that if his supervisor found out, he would lose his job, and maybe his life. This conflict reaches its own climax as Montag witnesses an old woman who willingly embraced death with her books in flames when the firemen came. Montag is stunned and distressed, exclaiming to her wife: “There must be something in books, things we can’t imagine… this fire will last me the rest of my life.” (54-55) Driven by that, Montag decides to leave his job and start reading, to find answers of his life and beyond. Montag’s change was almost predictable right from the start of the book, in that it follows the hero’s journey closely. He seemingly lack of thoughts and decisiveness could be due to the completely absence of education and philosophy. This is also a warning to our present society. Books are already starting to step down to TV, “Reader’s Digest” and magazines that eliminate the need to understand works of classic. Clarisse says that kids her age “all say the same things and nobody says anything different from anyone else.” (33) which sadly reminds me faintly of the present school system. TALONS is a different matter all together, but I have seem how countless would keep their silence and vote their support to the first voice that breaks the silence. In a fact-based education, in some countries more than others, kids learn that a question have only one answer, much like the straight-forward world that Montag lives in. Montag demonstrates a high level of inclusiveness and acceptance for new ideas among his fellow citizens. Clarisse shared with him that: “You’re not like the others. The others would walk off and leave me talking. Or threaten me. No one has time any more for anyone else.” (25) Perhaps that is what ultimately resulted in his turnaround.
Tick, plop. Droplets seemingly the size of marbles hammered into my soggy jacket, shoving my drained feet deeper into the dark mud. A scared squirrel scurried past me, but I could pay no attention to the world around me. My footsteps echoed in the confines of my head, an oddly hypnotic rhythm mixed with the sound of a faint, inarticulate heart. The world seems to have veiled itself with a featureless, ashen fog, stretching into infinity but at the same time squeezing and choking me like a cloth of lead. Time is a snail, dawdling in idleness as it witnessed my battles. Rest is for the weak, I must keep going, keep walking, keep fighting.
Attached here is my TALONS Talk!
Ps. sorry for the low quality keying, I forgot about greenscreen & I dont use AE
Note: The Talons Talk logo used a different red color value, kerning space and font family compared to the TED logo, which is copyrighted.